Rick
Perry, in his quest to become the next President of the United States, is
boasting that Texas has been a leader in almost everything under his watch as
Governor. Many of his boasts have been determined to be untrue at least in part
or whole. For example, he claims Texas is responsible for 1/3rd of the entire
job growth in the United States. A recent article published by the wire services has rated that one with two Pinocchios.
The
big thing Rick is not telling is the financial shape he has left Texas in. While
Rick and other right-wingers decry Democrats as drunken sailors taxing
and spending, what Mr.
Perry did was probably worse. He borrowed and spent. About the time Rick Perry
took office as a Republican, our state was almost debt free. Unfortunately, in a
recent local news publication called County Citizen, it is revealed that
Texas leads all states in the nation in the rate of increase in state and local
debt. Between 2007-2012, spending in our state has increased 18.2% while
revenue on the no new tax policy of Perry and others is down 1.1%.
Between
March, 2010, when Perry took office, until 2013, Texas’ state debt had more
than doubled. Statistics from the Texas Bond Review Board, a state agency, show
that from December, 2000, about the time Bush and Perry took control of our
state, our state debt was approximately $13.7 billion. Today it is more than
$34 billion. A huge chunk of this went on the Perry program of building toll
roads instead of maintaining the highway system which once was the pride of
America. In 2001, partially with Rick Perry’s leadership, Texans were convinced
to authorize a bond issue allowing the state to issue bonds for highways. The
reason a statewide constitutional amendment was necessary is that since about
1877 our state has had a constitutional provision to pay-as-you-go and not
allow the state to become indebted.
Following Perry’s lead, however, we, the citizens of Texas, authorized an indebtedness which was supposedly to be paid back by the increase in Texas’ economy (no new taxes). Unfortunately, our conservative leadership in Austin has ignored the debt such that now a substantial portion of our annual budget is going simply to pay interest.
Following Perry’s lead, however, we, the citizens of Texas, authorized an indebtedness which was supposedly to be paid back by the increase in Texas’ economy (no new taxes). Unfortunately, our conservative leadership in Austin has ignored the debt such that now a substantial portion of our annual budget is going simply to pay interest.
Exacerbating
the problem is the fact that Rick Perry created two or three slush funds and
diverted tax money to them which mostly went to his political cronies and
donors. Regrettably, a substantial number of the recipients of Perry’s
Business Development Funds went broke. Many were awarded millions of dollars
without proper investigation or vetting. And, at the same time, most of the
beneficiaries of Perry’s slush funds happened to be large contributors to his
campaigns.
A
big part of Texas’ indebtedness is the indebtedness of local school districts,
counties and cities. While local government bears its share of the blame for
deficit spending, a large part is also attributable to the fact our state
leadership and Legislature are so in love with the slogan of "no new taxes" that
they continue to push more of the responsibility for government onto the
cities, counties and school districts. Local governments have had to pick up
the slack in education, health, law enforcement, streets and roads and many
other areas formerly taken care of by our state government.
Still
another thing Perry won’t boast about on his trip around the country, touting his
leadership of Texas, is the way he claims to have maintained a balanced budget in
Texas. It was often done by cuts in essential state services. One of these examples is the $5 billion
he cut from public education while maintaining more than that in the Rainy Day
Fund. The Perry budgeting system has often been referred to as the method of
smoke and mirrors. Very few people outside of Austin really understand what is
meant by such tactics.
A prime example of smoke and mirrors occurred during one budgeting session of the Legislature wherein funding for schools was delayed by a few days. In other words, the school districts did not get their money on time. This delay placed funding for public education outside the fiscal year for which budgeting was taking place--therefore, the several billion dollars allocated to public education did not count in the budget. This made it easier for the State Comptroller to certify that our budget was within the range of anticipated revenue. Such tactics make a mockery out of the spend-as-you-go mandate of our state’s constitution.
Borrowing like a man with a credit card for which he thinks there will be no tomorrow is offensive and detrimental to our state.
A prime example of smoke and mirrors occurred during one budgeting session of the Legislature wherein funding for schools was delayed by a few days. In other words, the school districts did not get their money on time. This delay placed funding for public education outside the fiscal year for which budgeting was taking place--therefore, the several billion dollars allocated to public education did not count in the budget. This made it easier for the State Comptroller to certify that our budget was within the range of anticipated revenue. Such tactics make a mockery out of the spend-as-you-go mandate of our state’s constitution.
Borrowing like a man with a credit card for which he thinks there will be no tomorrow is offensive and detrimental to our state.
While
Perry continues to try to polish his credentials as a true conservative and
great leader, I can only hope some of his Republican primary opponents will
tell the truth about him and what he did in our state–or to our state.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are reviewed and it may take a little bit before your comment is published. Anonymous contributions take a lot longer and may perish for lack of attention.