Since the United States Supreme
Court has ruled corporations are people and money is speech, it appears more
than ever American politics is up for grabs based on money. Several months ago I wrote an article
recommending that a great investment money-wise was to give a large
contribution in the range of $100,000 to $200,000 to Rick Perry.
In hindsight, with the current scandals
of multi-million dollar, no-bid contracts and other giveaways by the Perry
administration of millions to supporters, it seems my financial advice was
right on point. More and more
evidence is being uncovered that there was a direct connection between awards
from various slush funds of taxpayer money and contributions from the
beneficiaries of those awards to Perry’s various campaigns.
The Koch brothers now have revealed
they intend to spend about $900 million on the coming presidential
election. They classify their
commitment of nearly a billion dollars as an investment. Last time I checked, business folks
expect a profitable return from any investment they make. The larger the investment, the larger
return they expect.
Ordinary folks, whether
Republican or Democrat, should pause thoughtfully to consider whether or not
the trend of more and more money that is kept more and more secret is in the
interest of democracy. More
specifically, middle class working folks should consider whether or not it is
in their interest. If money talks, do you really believe if you are an “average Joe” working for an hourly
wage that you can be heard as well as a $900 million contribution?
More and more hypocrisy and
money are drowning out basic American values--particularly many values which are
trumpeted by conservatives. A
glaring example is the case of Denton, Texas, where a grassroots movement forced the city to adopt an
anti-fracking ordinance. Earth
tremors, polluting water supplies–even to the extent of being able to light a
fire on water from your water well–drove citizens to demand accountability of
the oil companies.
Because of massive
lobbying, expenditures and oil company largess to our state leaders, it is very
likely the Legislature will push through a measure disallowing cities to
protect their citizens as did the city of Denton. Most defenders of unlimited, secret spending and favoring
national and state measures over local ones are supported by big-money efforts
and lobbying. To influence
elections is bad enough, but even worse is the allowance of massive spending
without revealing the sources.
Even though the Koch brothers have announced their intention to spend
$900 million, it will be spent in such a way--through 501c(3) corporations or
volunteer groups with high-sounding names--the average citizen will never know
from whence came the massive loads of money to influence the election of their
leaders. The will of the public in
this regard is pretty much being ignored.
The Federal Election
Commission has recently called for comments on proposals to put limits on secrecy
and the way huge money donors can spend their money. Even though 75% of the comments favor restrictions, openness
and disclosure, I will wager that few, if any, of these measures will be adopted-- continuing the Supreme Court mandate that we offer our political leadership for
sale.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are reviewed and it may take a little bit before your comment is published. Anonymous contributions take a lot longer and may perish for lack of attention.