In the 1950's a representative from Conroe named Cox was proceeding to
rake in some extra dough by introducing the bi-annual bill to abolish
naturopaths’ practice in Texas when he got caught. The naturopaths, being tired of the routine, proceeded to
take a suitcase full of money to the Driskill Hotel, and also took a wire
recorder, which they hid under the bed in the room where the money change was
to take place. Unfortunately for
Mr. Cox, his whole bargain to trade his bill for money was uncovered, and that
was the end of the naturopath scam and also the end of Mr. Cox’ political
career. Mr. Cox ended up being a
guest of the Texas Department of Corrections for a couple of years following
the scandal.
I
recently called this incident to mind because of an article I read in one of
the daily newspapers by an editorial writer pointing out that some bills are
still being introduced for the purpose of acquiring money.
It
is a fact that some bills are actually introduced because of the author’s legitimate concern
that the bill introduced could address. And it is a fact that others are introduced merely for educational purposes–to raise issues
and bring about a public discussion of various things encompassed by the bills
as introduced. Unfortunately, the
practice of introducing bills for money reasons also still exists--and yet too many legislators have become more
sophisticated in avoiding criminal liability because they never author bills to
deep-six in exchange for payments.
Most savvy politicians understand that introduction of a bill will attract the
attention of the people interested in the subject matter of the bill. Unfortunately, even observers of the
legislative process, both in Congress and the state Legislature, are usually
not quite sophisticated enough to understand at the outset whether or not the
bill has a real chance of becoming law.
In any case, almost every bill which touches a special interest group in
the Legislature will attract money either to support the bill or kill the bill.
There
have been recent discussions on why the House of Representatives in the United
States Congress would introduce a bill to de-fund or repeal the Affordable Care
Act some 40 times knowing full well that any effort to do so was futile. They all know in advance that such a
bill would need to be passed by the Senate and be signed by the President. Even the rankest, newest politician in
Washington would know that neither event could happen as long as Democrats
controlled the Senate and occupied the presidential office. Nonetheless, bill after bill was
introduced attempting to thwart Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act. Primarily, in this instance, it was to
solidify support, raise money and establish the ultraconservative credentials
of those supporting the measure.
I
would invite you to sift through the some 5,000 to 6,000 bills introduced last
session in the Texas Legislature.
It would not take you very long to find several hundred of them which
obviously had no chance of ever being seriously considered. As a matter of fact, you would probably
find a majority of the bills never made it through the hearing process of
committees. Moreover, several never
even reached the stage of having a committee hearing. It would not take an intelligent person very long to ferret
out those introduced purely for political purposes to establish the politician’s
credentials as a liberal or conservative, or to alert a special interest group
which would be willing to raise money to support a bill’s sponsor of a bill
favored by that group. Sad to say,
but it is fact that there are still bills being introduced for the money.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are reviewed and it may take a little bit before your comment is published. Anonymous contributions take a lot longer and may perish for lack of attention.