Of late, I have been giving serious thought to simply giving up. It
occurs to me that I could be wrong about my philosophy of life and
economic policy of the United States. I’ve always thought that if you
infused enough money into the lower end of the economic spectrum, rich
folks would figure out a way to end up with most of it. Alas, perhaps
there is some chance that the Koch brothers, right-wing nuts and other
Republicans are right. Maybe, if we take care of the very, very rich,
the multibillionaires, they will somehow allow enough to trickle down
to take care of all the poor folks in the country.
Further,
adopting the thinking of the current Republican establishment,
including the nation’s Supreme Court, I’ve thought of an idea that would
allow us to be more realistic in the current Supreme Court approach to
politics and at the same time eliminate the nation’s deficit.
First
of all we would need to create a new agency of government called the
USA National Lottery Commission--not for having anything like a state
lottery, but in order to create a draft similar to the nation’s NFL, NBA
or baseball. The lottery would gather all who had wealth enough to
participate in the new system and allow them to draft particular players
based on a drawing which would assign each billionaire a standing by
chance. Each billionaire would then have the right to purchase an office
holder outright. The money would be used to defray the national debt,
and billionaires could, upfront, own a politician. This would at least
do away with the current myth that politicians who accept millions from
billionaires are still their own man or woman, as the case may be.
Instead
of wasting money on TV ads, newsprint, robo-calls and such, these
billionaires would own the politician outright, and the money would go
directly into the treasury to pay off our national debt. I would think
United States Senators would be worth somewhere in the neighborhood of
$2-3 million dollars each; U.S. Representatives, at least $1 million; state
senators, somewhere in the neighborhood of $600-700,000, and state
reps would be evaluated based on the size of the budget they help
control in their particular states. New York, California and Texas state
reps, for example, should be worth at least half a million. Montana? may be only $100,000.
Aside
from helping the national debt, this would completely remove hypocrisy
from the current system in which our nation’s Supreme Court has declared
that corporations are people and that spending money in elections is
the same thing as free speech.
I
recognize the danger in offering such an innovative program, and there
are people who will ridicule the idea or even think I am serious. This
brings to mind the words of Bob Eckhardt to me when, once, while serving
in the Texas House, I defeated an idiotic bill by the use of satire.
The senator from El Paso had actually passed a bill through the Senate
making it a crime to show or display the U.N. flag anywhere in, on or
around a public building and accompanied the prohibition with a
mandatory $50 fine. I laid one amendment on the speaker’s desk and the
House sponsors then fled from sponsoring the measure. My amendment
simply provided that instead of a $50 fine it carried a mandatory death
sentence. My thought was that if flying a U.N. flag was considered
treasonous to the United States, the punishment should be appropriate to
accompany the crime. State Representative Eckhardt, later to become congressman, warned me that he was certain that in the time of Jonathan
Swift, who wrote Gulliver’s Travels,
some people took Swift seriously when he suggested that in order to
alleviate the famine in Ireland Irish babies should be served up for
dinner.
With that in mind, hopefully, this scenario will be food for thought–at least for
thinking people.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are reviewed and it may take a little bit before your comment is published. Anonymous contributions take a lot longer and may perish for lack of attention.